Merger
Idea Under Construction 2011-2012 Akademik Yılı Toplantı Tarihleri
Bu sonuca göre işte toplantı tarihleri
26 Ekim 2011 Çarşamba
21 Kasım 2011 Ptesi
26 Aralık 2011 Ptesi
13 Şubat 2012 Ptesi
12 Mart 2012 Ptesi
14 Mayıs 2012 Ptesi
Bazı toplantıların presenter ve facilitator'ı da seçildi ama daha tam netleşmediği için onları bir sonraki toplantıdan sonra sizlerle paylaşacağız.
Tüm Professional Learning Community üyelerini saygıyla selamlıyor gözlerinden öpüyoruz.
IDEA UNDER CONSTRUCTION
Idea Under Construction Session 2
16th December 2010
Presenter:
Facilitator: Seden Mıhçıoğlu
Protocol: Issaquah
Date : 16th December 2010
Topic: How can we identifiy our goals not based on numbers.
Expected outcome: Checking our goals and formulating a new way to chose a goal.
Our meeting started by Seden Mıhcıoğlu. She mentioned Issaquah protocol breifly with Powerpoint presentation . By the help of the presentation ,group members had an idea about the steps of Issaquah protocol. Then Didem Şıranur presented her dilemma using power point presentattion .(Showing examples of the goals that the departments have.) Please see the following link .
Group members asked probbing and clarifying questions.
Probing Questions:,
Q: Where can we start ?
A : We can start with small groups. First, teachers can decide their individual needs and their own goals.
Q : How can we manage to participate every teacher for checking their own goals ?
A : Each group member can mention the meeting feedbacks in their departments.
Suggestios :
Ø Departments need to revise their goals.
Ø We can have an in service training about how to decide our goals.
Decisisons:
*
Idea Under Construction's First Meeting - 25 November 2010
Elif Avcıbası talked about the dilemma she had faced and she explained that in English exams there is always a writing part. The students are expected to write guided compositions since theyare young leraners and their time is limited. In the exams they are asked to answer the given questions and they are expected to write accordingly. Although there are set questions, some students write irrelevantly. What should we do with these compositions? Should we evaluate them according to the scala provided or should not we give any points?
After she listened to the suggestions her colleagues made , she took her notes. These are what they suggested doing.
1. Before the exams , the students can be given quizzes and they can practice the writing part by using the guiding questions. If there are students that write unrelatedly then the teacher can conference the students.
2. In the exams , there can be a checklistfor the students to see if there are any missing points they missed.
3. Just to get the students on the right track, the beginning and the end can be given and then they can go on writing.
4. The guiding questions can still be given to help the students with ideas but they may not have to be answered by the students. If the student has a different idea, then he should be allowed to use it freely. He should not miss any points for not using the ideas the teacher wants him to use.
5. The scala can be prepared according to the aim of the lesson. If writing is important , there shouldn’t be compulsory questions to answer. If answering the questions is important, then they should be tested in another part of the exam.
IDEA UNDER CONSTRUCTION
The members of the group and their nick names are:
Tarz Tuba (Aktuğ)
Düzenli Dilek (Okay)
Eğitimsever Elif (Avcıbaşı)
Eğlenceli Esin (Alper)
Sakin Seden (Mıhçıoğlu)
Araştırmacı Aylin (Gazanfer)
Artist Ayça (Kır)
Kazım Ergenç
Didem Şiranur
Hülya Sabuncu
The following meetings.....
25th November 2010
16.00-17.00
Topic: If a student writes irrelevant things in his/her essay how should I grade it?
Expected Outcome: A related part in the rubric
Presenter: Elif Avcıbaşı
Facilitator: Ayça Kır
Protocal: Consultancy
16th December 2010
Topic: Identifiying our goals not based on numbers.
Expected outcome: Checking our goals and formulating a new way to chose a goal.
Presenter: Didem Şiranur
Facilitator: Seden Mıhçıoğlu
Protocol: Issaquah
5th January 2011
Topic: How should we behave to the parents who are denying some school rules.
Expected outcome: Finding a new perspective
Presenter: Esin Alper
Facilitator: Aylin Gazanfer
Protocol: Chalk Talk
23rd February 2011
Topic: Evaluation of students and teachers.
Expected outcome: Preparing a new rubric and a new form for evaluating ss and teacher.
Presenter: Ayça Kır
Facilitator: Tuba Aktuğ
Protocol: Tunning
14th April 2011
Not organized yet
11th May 2011
Not organized yet